Pittsfield Board Hesitant to Develop Short Term Rental Regulations

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Community Development Board wants to learn more about the impact of short-term rentals in the city before creating a regulation or governing ordinance for them.

In March, the Ordinances and Rules subcommittee referred a petition to the board that requested an investigation of claims concerning Airbnbs in the neighborhood of Ridge Avenue.

The council asked for a response by June with an expectation that they would give guidance on a process for short-term rentals yet the board is hesitant to take action without all of the information in front of them.

"This is a really difficult issue that most communities, especially at least locally, cannot seem to have a great handle on," City Planner CJ Hoss said at last week's meeting. 

"It's creating division, and isn't necessarily moving forward in a productive manner where it looks like there's a clear solution that anyone's come up with."

Hoss said it boils down to if there is an actual problem with short-term rentals in the city or not. He reported receiving some complaints about such properties over the year but not on a frequent basis.

When you search "Pittsfield" on Airbnb.com, nearly 800 results appear.

Typical complaints include overcrowding, too many vehicles, too much noise, and trash issues, which Hoss speculated could be addressed through other city departments.

The two possible paths that could be taken for addressing short-term rentals based on other communities' policies are implementing a short-term rental registration program or addressing them through a zoning ordinance.

With the registration program would come issues with staffing, as the city doesn't have the extra staff to uphold inspections and enforcement at the moment.

Hoss also added that these solutions won't necessarily stop the sources of complaints that have been received and that the city doesn't know if the short-term rentals in question are actively advertised and would be affected by it.

Board members agreed that the city doesn't have the staff for the venture.

"It seems like right now, if try to get something inspected it takes weeks, sometimes even months and we don't have the personnel, I don't know if we have money to hire new personnel," Floriana Fitzgerald said.

"So it just makes it very difficult to regulate something when you don't have people to enforce the regulation, I don't know if that's really a good reason not to have regulation but that's really a big problem I foresee."


Libby Herland said if Pittsfield has a problem with Airbnb-type rentals, it is not obvious to her.

"We don't have data, and to develop a regulation whether it's through a registration program or through zoning when we don't really have the data that tells us what's going on in Pittsfield, to know how it's impacting Pittsfield and what the trends may be, and we don't seem to really have a problem, at least that most of us can point to, I'm really hesitant to do anything," she said.

"Because I don't have a problem so much with the registration, but I do have a real concern about the ability for the city to handle that registration program and yes, we would charge a fee but I don't think it would bring in enough money to pay for a new position, which really you probably would need a new position or a halftime position or something like that.

"So with all that said, I think I'm basically more on the line of not doing anything or putting it on hold and seeing if we could get more data about what's going on in particular in Pittsfield."

Gary Levante brought up a concern about outside investors building properties in the city for short-term rentals and creating a housing affordability issue.

"I know this necessarily isn't an issue here and now today in Pittsfield, but there's an issue in many parts of the country, it is an issue in many communities," He said.

"And as we think about housing affordability in our communities being a major challenge and access to quality, affordable and quality housing stock being another challenge although this isn't an issue here and now today, at least as far as I can tell, I do think it is something that we should be thinking about as a community just because we shouldn't wait for something to be a problem before we look to address that because if we proactively address it, then we have that opportunity to prevent the impacts that can be a result of that."

Hoss said there are a few different things that can be done to pinpoint short-term rentals while recognizing that it is a great undertaking for the department's personnel.

He added that they can start to piece information together but may need some time depending on other projects.

Herland mentioned that the council will probably want a plan for collecting data with the board's response and it was mentioned that a consultant could be used, which would be dependent on securing funds.

"What I'm hearing is that in order to make any decision about whether we need regulation or zoning for short-term rentals, we need more information on short term rentals in general and whether there is a specific problem regarding them in the city of Pittsfield, so that's something that requires personnel and time," Chair Sheila Irvin observed.

"And so it seems that what our response to the City Council is is that we understand that this is a potential problem but it doesn't seem to be a problem at the moment, and we do have some ways of dealing with problems here and there and that we do need time to really get a handle on what the impact would be in Pittsfield."


Tags: Planning Board,   short-term rentals,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council OKs $3M Borrowing for Failing PHS Boilers

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council has authorized the borrowing of $3 million for new boilers at Pittsfield High School — a project that was originally going to be funded by ARPA.

The nearly 100-year-old boilers are original to the building and have exceeded their useful life, officials say. They are converted locomotive engines that are extremely inefficient and expensive to maintain.

The replacement design was recently completed and a low bid was received. After looking at the numbers, it was clear that the allocated $1 million in American Rescue Plan Act funds would not be enough.

"$213,210 was spent on emergency repairs and the design work for the replacement project," Finance Director Matthew Kerwood confirmed in an email.
 
"The low and only bid for the replacement was $2,482,000, however given the complexity of this project I felt that a 20 percent contingency would be needed which gets to the $3,000,000 authorization. If the entire amount is not needed, the remaining unused balance will be rescinded at some point in the future."

The project is also time-sensitive, as one boiler is non-operational and another is severely compromised. If they fail during the heating season, the school will have to close.

"The contractor that was the low bid, in 30 days he can walk away from that bid if he wants to, and the other problem is I need to get this project underway to hopefully get them in and running by the time school reopens up for wintertime," Building Maintenance Director Brian Filiault explained.

"This is a major project, a major project. We're taking three locomotives out of that building and it's no easy thing. I mean, the building is built around it and we have a small portal that we actually will be able to get it out, we'll have to crane everything else. It's a very labor-intensive, very hard job, and I'm afraid of the timeframe because I can't run those boilers again. They've gone as far as they're going to go."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories